- #FUSION 360 LINUX FOR FREE#
- #FUSION 360 LINUX SOFTWARE#
- #FUSION 360 LINUX CODE#
- #FUSION 360 LINUX FREE#
#FUSION 360 LINUX FREE#
In the end, it was encouraging that I got a personal phone call, as a free user, asking for my feedback.in the age of automated feedback responses. I explained what I had been doing, and he asked what I liked about Fusion that OnShape did not include. The dude just asked how I was liking it, if this was my first CAD experience, if so, what been hardest to understand. I had been using OnShape for maybe two months designing different things to 3D print and one Friday morning I got a call from one of the marketing and customer support team members at OnShape. Maybe someone will make a FS for that, or has and I haven’t found it. He turned me on to OnShape because he found it be the best alternative to SD, which for the most part is the industry leader.Ī large con if you’re 3D printing and using mesh/stl files, OnShape cannot use them, or I have been unable to find a way for OnShape to work with them. Better or worse, depending on your preferences, but my brother is an engineering professor and almost exclusively works in SD. I like to design hydrofoils and there are multiple featurescripts for that task that have helped a ton.Ģ) It is a lot similar to SolidWorks.
#FUSION 360 LINUX CODE#
If the program doesn’t have what you need to do, someone can write the code for it. Some awesome concepts that have kept me using OnShape are:ġ) FeatureScript. Lack of CAM is meh, I don’t do anything with it yet, but may in the future, so if you need that, you maybe need to look elsewhere. I was toying around with both for the last 9 months or so. I have almost as much experience in OnShape as I do in Fusion. The way I see it nothing is free except blender, and you have to spend money to make money. I understand people’s frustration with Autodesk nerfing fusion, and it’s a bummer to be sure.
#FUSION 360 LINUX FOR FREE#
Rhino is great and cheaper in the long run, but it doesn’t have convenient parametric features and and UI is much worse (in my opinion), although it does have grasshopper for free which is awesome (the Autodesk version of grasshopper dynamo has a high three figure license cost. Also the commercial license is $2100/year/seat which at this point is 7x cost of fusion. Onshape has very limited surfacing and no CAM. The fact is there is no cheaper or more capable CAD program for industrial design. Personally I’m sticking with fusion because I have $300 to spend on a year of highly versatile design and manufacturing software.
![fusion 360 linux fusion 360 linux](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1984798/89576398-9ab1c880-d805-11ea-9efd-306fae5ccea8.png)
But they didn’t like how uncontrollably slow modeling or viewing a model could be (like when onshapes servers are bogged down with users).
#FUSION 360 LINUX SOFTWARE#
From what I understand the engineers loved the collaboration features built into the software ( they could all edit the same model simultaneously) and the sharing features (they could easily send a link to vendors with flexible privacy controls). I used Fusion as an industrial designer in an office that mainly used onshape. Also also classist people who think that "if you can't afford the license then find a new hobby" can find the nearest dumpster and deposit themselves in it until they've thought about the way they are gate-keeping something that brings people joy. I am not personally against this but I don't want to mar this post with talk of illegal activity, especially when pirating is not a viable option for a lot of people who are uncomfortable with it. Much love to the community here for making Fusion360 what it was.Įdit: Oh yeah, the alternatives suggested should be free or reasonably cheap. This should be a post solely for information about other CAD/CAM programs.
![fusion 360 linux fusion 360 linux](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/R-ev3dhNM98/maxresdefault.jpg)
So, what are your favorite alternatives to Fusion? What are their strengths, what are their weaknesses? What can they do, what can't they do? I'm aware that one program probably won't fulfill all the needs of Fusion, but a list of places with similar functionality is a start.Īgain, let's not debate the new decisions, there are other posts for that. I also was recently advertised SolidFace, which has some free licenses to give away, but I believe they are limited in number and in functionality. Solid Edge looks like it could be very similar to Fusion, but the UI has been puzzling me so far and there are not very many good tutorials on Youtube. So far, it doesn't seem like Blender is great for the parametric part/assembly modeling that Fusion is so good at, nor does it have CAM functionality (correct me if I'm wrong on any of these points). Personally, I downloaded Blender and Solid Edge Community Edition.
![fusion 360 linux fusion 360 linux](https://dashboard.snapcraft.io/site_media/appmedia/2021/08/icon_tLZoZKA.png)
That being said, I thought the community would be the best place to talk about other options. No matter how you feel about them, positive or negative, it is clear that if Autodesk does not revise their decision, many of us will be leaving and looking towards other programs to fulfill our needs.
![fusion 360 linux fusion 360 linux](https://www.solidsmack.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/fusion-360-online-browser.jpg)
I'm hoping to start a semi-official thread on alternatives to Fusion360.įirst of all, this is not a post that is meant to strike debate over the new changes.